BREAKING: I hope that she does it. Hillary Clinton is thinking about Suing Trump for $100 billion for Defamation…

In a potential escalation of one of American politics’ most enduring rivalries, former Secretary of State and 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is reportedly weighing a massive defamation lawsuit against President Donald Trump, seeking up to $100 billion in damages.

The claim, which has circulated widely on social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, Instagram, and Threads in early February 2026, stems from anonymous “sources close to Clinton” who say she is consulting with top lawyers. The alleged basis for the suit centers on years of repeated public statements, rally remarks, social media posts, and interviews by Trump accusing Clinton of corruption, misconduct, and criminal behavior during her time as Secretary of State and beyond. Clinton’s team reportedly argues that these claims have caused irreparable harm to her reputation and legacy.
Posts sharing the headline often include phrases like “I hope that she does it” or “BREAKING,” accompanied by dramatic images or graphics emphasizing the staggering sum. Variations of the story have appeared on accounts ranging from news aggregators to individual users, with some posts gaining significant engagement— one viral post amassed tens of thousands of likes and reposts.
However, as of February 8, 2026, no formal lawsuit has been filed in any court, and no official statement has come from Hillary Clinton, her representatives, or her legal team confirming the reports. Major mainstream news outlets have not independently verified or reported on the development, and searches of court records and reliable political reporting show no evidence of active preparations or filings.
This rumor echoes past legal battles between the two figures. Notably, Trump previously filed lawsuits against Clinton, including a dismissed racketeering (RICO) case related to the 2016 election, which a federal judge described as “frivolous” and filed in “bad faith.” Trump and his attorneys were sanctioned nearly $1 million in that matter, with appeals courts upholding the penalties as recently as late 2025.

Defamation lawsuits involving public figures like Clinton and Trump face high hurdles under U.S. law. Plaintiffs must prove “actual malice”—that false statements were made with knowledge of their falsity or reckless disregard for the truth—thanks to the landmark New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) Supreme Court ruling. The requested $100 billion figure is unprecedented in defamation cases, dwarfing even high-profile awards (such as those in recent media or personal injury suits), and would likely face intense scrutiny on grounds of excessiveness and feasibility.
Legal experts commenting on similar hypothetical scenarios have noted that such a case could drag on for years, becoming a media spectacle while facing significant procedural and evidentiary challenges. If pursued, it would add another chapter to the long history of litigation between Trump and his political opponents.
For now, the story appears to be driven primarily by social media speculation and unconfirmed reports rather than concrete legal action. Neither Clinton nor Trump has publicly addressed the circulating claims directly. Should developments occur, they would likely be announced through official channels or court filings.
This situation highlights the ongoing tensions between the two political figures and the role of viral online narratives in shaping public perception of high-profile rivalries. Updates will follow if any official confirmation emerges.